<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Th13x3.5BRMU, a lens review.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/</link>
	<description>A blog covering my experiences working as a director on S106 projects. And my work with the HPX300 and P+S Technik Mini35 combination. This is where I will post my day to day life, my experiences and other work related stuff. Erhm… I guess mostly work related stuff.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 15:56:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: balster</title>
		<link>http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>balster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:08:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.s106.com/?p=289#comment-49</guid>
		<description>To my knowledge the noise is a sensor issue, it being quite small. Would be interesting to check if the new lens has less noise. As soon as I have the time I will do a noise comparison and ad this to the review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To my knowledge the noise is a sensor issue, it being quite small. Would be interesting to check if the new lens has less noise. As soon as I have the time I will do a noise comparison and ad this to the review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franck</title>
		<link>http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Franck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.s106.com/?p=289#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this review, I&#039;m a littel disapointed about the original lens of this camera because of the noise in the image (in full HD mode with CAC), is this one less noisy?? What is you feeling about the 2?
Franck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this review, I&#8217;m a littel disapointed about the original lens of this camera because of the noise in the image (in full HD mode with CAC), is this one less noisy?? What is you feeling about the 2?<br />
Franck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: balster</title>
		<link>http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>balster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.s106.com/?p=289#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Hi Stijn,

A lot can go wrong between the original recording and the broadcast, compression, bad downscaling to SD etc. I think downscaling is your best bet, did you shoot HD? Was is broadcast in SD?

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Stijn,</p>
<p>A lot can go wrong between the original recording and the broadcast, compression, bad downscaling to SD etc. I think downscaling is your best bet, did you shoot HD? Was is broadcast in SD?</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stijn</title>
		<link>http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/comment-page-1/#comment-46</link>
		<dc:creator>stijn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 09:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.s106.com/?p=289#comment-46</guid>
		<description>Do you have any problems with focus on the standard lens for the Hpx300?
I shot with this camera for national television and when it aired, the image wasn&#039;t half as sharp as viewed in the viewfinder

grts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have any problems with focus on the standard lens for the Hpx300?<br />
I shot with this camera for national television and when it aired, the image wasn&#8217;t half as sharp as viewed in the viewfinder</p>
<p>grts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/comment-page-1/#comment-45</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.s106.com/?p=289#comment-45</guid>
		<description>Hi Balster:

Thanks for the evaluation, it is very helpful. I just wish that there was a nice wide angle lens available more in the $3k to $4k range but even $6k isn&#039;t that bad.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Balster:</p>
<p>Thanks for the evaluation, it is very helpful. I just wish that there was a nice wide angle lens available more in the $3k to $4k range but even $6k isn&#8217;t that bad.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Nattrass</title>
		<link>http://blog.s106.com/2010/01/18/th13x3-5brmu-a-lens-review/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Nattrass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 14:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.s106.com/?p=289#comment-44</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the review it is good to see good comparisons like this before any lens purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the review it is good to see good comparisons like this before any lens purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
